A good outcome for aphasia

Not provided

Contributors

Wallace, Sarah J. Worrall, Linda Rose, Tanya Le Dorze, Guylaine

Publication

Journal: Aphasiology
Volume:
Issue:
Pages: 1 - 5
Year: 2014
DOI: 10.1080/02687038.2014.935119

Further Study Information

Current Stage: Not Applicable
Date:
Funding source(s): This research was funded by the Australian Postgraduate Award Scholarship.

---

Method(s)

- N/A

Linked Studies

• A core outcome set for aphasia treatment research: The ROMA consensus statement
• Using the International Classification of Functioning, Disability, and Health to identify outcome domains for a core outcome set for aphasia: a comparison of stakeholder perspectives
• Measuring outcomes in aphasia research: A review of current practice and an agenda for standardisation
• Which treatment outcomes are most important to aphasia clinicians and managers? An international e-Delphi consensus study
• Which outcomes are most important to people with aphasia and their families? an international nominal group technique study framed within the ICF
• Core Outcomes in Aphasia Treatment Research: An e-Delphi Consensus Study of International Aphasia Researchers.
• Core Outcome Set Use in Poststroke Aphasia Treatment Research: Examining Barriers and Facilitators to Implementation Using the Theoretical Domains Framework
• Measuring communication as a core outcome in aphasia trials: Results of the ROMA-2 international core outcome set development meeting
• ‘A Meaningful Difference, but Not Ultimately the Difference I Would Want’: A Mixed-Methods Approach to Explore and Benchmark Clinically Meaningful Changes in Aphasia Recovery

Related Links

No related links