In contrast to the wealth of psychometric evidence for individual measures of mental ill-health at both symptom and diagnosis (syndrome) level, we know little about the best way to measure mental health (including both positive and negative mental health states) at the population level. The project aims to develop, validate and agree a suite of core outcomes sets appropriate for use in evaluative public mental health research. The work forms part of a School for Public Health Research (SPHR) integrated programme to address determinants of poor public mental health and improve outcomes.
AimThe aim of this project was to identify a set of outcome measures suitable for use in evaluative public mental health research
ContributorsJoe Hulin, Maria Perkins, Emma Adams, Miriam Blom-Smith, Helen Buckley Woods, Mark Clowes,Jennifer
Dykxhoorn, Laura Fischer, Oliver Jones, Eileen Kaner, Judi Kidger, Clara Mukuria, David Osborn, Mylene
Petermann, Vanessa Pinfold, Ruth Plackett, Sheena Ramsey, Liam Spencer, Ami Vadgama, Kate Walters,
Victoria Zamperoni, Scott Weich.
Disease Category: Mental health, Public health
Disease Name:
Age Range: 18 - 120
Sex: Either
Nature of Intervention: Other
- Charities
- Clinical experts
- Consumers (patients)
- Economists
- Methodologists
- Patient/ support group representatives
- Researchers
- Service providers
- Service users
- COS for clinical trials or clinical research
- COS for practice
- Recommendations for outcome measures (measurement/how)
- Consensus meeting
- Delphi process
- Systematic review
The work includes the following five work streams:
WS1: Protocol development
Details of the study finalised in accordance with COMET guidance and agreed with stakeholders.
WS2: Evidence synthesis
A systematic review of public mental health outcomes will be undertaken. We will aim to include content analysis, methods for scoring and analysing data, prior application and psychometric properties at individual and population levels. We will initially seek to identify the domains which should be covered by public mental health outcomes.
WS3: Stakeholder consultation
Stakeholder consultation events will take place throughout the project to reach consensus on the key aspects of public mental health that should be measured in the core outcome set and reach agreement on the how these will be measured. We will work closely with SPHR colleagues delivering a related work package and the McPin Foundation in recruiting key stakeholders. The stakeholder group will include members of the public, public health practitioners, policy makers, commissioners and researchers.
WS4: Mapping routine data sources
We will identify existing data resources to determine if and how the core outcomes identified can be accessed in routine sources.
WS5: Dissemination
We will recommend a suite of public health outcome measures, stratified according to the types of intervention they are suited to evaluating and including a core public mental health outcome set.